Impossibility excuse arises when

Impossibility excuse arises when

• A. The contract is excused due to destruction.
• B. Destruction of something necessary for performance provides a good excuse.
• C. Destruction of identified goods excuses the buyer.
• D. Impossibility requires purposeful destruction.

Answer: (B)

Impossibility of performance arises when the thing essential to fulfilling the contract is destroyed, making it physically impossible to perform. If the subject matter or a required instrument is destroyed through no fault of the parties, performance cannot occur, so the contract is discharged. This is why destruction of something necessary for performance is the correct idea—it captures the essence of why the obligation is excused. Destruction that isn’t essential, or destruction tied to purposeful acts, doesn’t automatically trigger impossibility, and simply stating destruction of the contract in broad terms isn’t precise enough.

Impossibility of performance arises when the thing essential to fulfilling the contract is destroyed, making it physically impossible to perform. If the subject matter or a required instrument is destroyed through no fault of the parties, performance cannot occur, so the contract is discharged. This is why destruction of something necessary for performance is the correct idea—it captures the essence of why the obligation is excused. Destruction that isn’t essential, or destruction tied to purposeful acts, doesn’t automatically trigger impossibility, and simply stating destruction of the contract in broad terms isn’t precise enough.