Which statement best describes the correct interpretation of strict scrutiny?

Which statement best describes the correct interpretation of strict scrutiny?

• A. Strict Scrutiny requires no more than a rational basis.
• B. Intermediate Scrutiny requires a compelling government interest.
• C. Rational Basis requires a legitimate interest.
• D. Strict Scrutiny requires the government to show a compelling interest.

Answer: (D)

Strict scrutiny is the highest level of review used when a law affects a fundamental right or targets a suspect class. The government must prove a compelling interest for the law and that the means chosen are narrowly tailored to achieve that interest (the means must be necessary and closely fitted to the goal). The statement that the government must show a compelling interest captures this central burden, making it the best description among the options. The other statements mix up the levels: rational basis is the least stringent, intermediate scrutiny requires substantial—not necessarily compelling—government interest, and describing rational basis as requiring a legitimate interest misstates the standard entirely.

Strict scrutiny is the highest level of review used when a law affects a fundamental right or targets a suspect class. The government must prove a compelling interest for the law and that the means chosen are narrowly tailored to achieve that interest (the means must be necessary and closely fitted to the goal). The statement that the government must show a compelling interest captures this central burden, making it the best description among the options. The other statements mix up the levels: rational basis is the least stringent, intermediate scrutiny requires substantial—not necessarily compelling—government interest, and describing rational basis as requiring a legitimate interest misstates the standard entirely.